<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks launches new ad campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidhelbig.com/starbucks-launches-new-ad-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidhelbig.com/starbucks-launches-new-ad-campaign/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James in Belgium</title>
		<link>http://davidhelbig.com/starbucks-launches-new-ad-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>James in Belgium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidhelbig.com/?p=1805#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Weird.

What strikes me is that this starts out with, &quot;we&#039;re gonna tell our own story ... we&#039;re gonna take this back to where it really is ...&quot; etc., theme of authenticity, showing the original Starbucks store, and this is all centered around a great new ad campaign ...

To make the ad campaign itself seem more &quot;authentic,&quot; real Starbucks employees get to &quot;have their say&quot; about it - &quot;what do you like about this?&quot;

They then show the ads.  And what are these ads?  A lot of slogans.  Nice slogans, like &quot;each cup is served with love,&quot; and &quot;if it&#039;s not right the first time, we&#039;ll make it right, &amp; if it&#039;s not right then, make sure you&#039;re in a Starbucks.&quot;  Good as far as slogans go.  But not really revealing anything unique about Starbucks - I&#039;m sure the many other coffeehouses would claim the same.

I think this shows me how &quot;social media&quot; is now somehow identified with &quot;grassroots&quot; and &quot;reaching out,&quot; but that the message really hasn&#039;t changed.  They may do something &quot;innovative&quot; like create a facebook app, or start advertising in social media.  But at the heart of it - the message - it&#039;s the same.  It&#039;s just an extra &quot;gloss&quot; and attempt at making an already-existing message somehow seem more &quot;real.&quot;

Odd as well: it almost sounds like a group of Christians sitting around talking about the gospel.  At first I thought that this was going to be some kind of Christian spoof on Starbucks, with a type of moral lesson at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird.</p>
<p>What strikes me is that this starts out with, &#8220;we&#8217;re gonna tell our own story &#8230; we&#8217;re gonna take this back to where it really is &#8230;&#8221; etc., theme of authenticity, showing the original Starbucks store, and this is all centered around a great new ad campaign &#8230;</p>
<p>To make the ad campaign itself seem more &#8220;authentic,&#8221; real Starbucks employees get to &#8220;have their say&#8221; about it &#8211; &#8220;what do you like about this?&#8221;</p>
<p>They then show the ads.  And what are these ads?  A lot of slogans.  Nice slogans, like &#8220;each cup is served with love,&#8221; and &#8220;if it&#8217;s not right the first time, we&#8217;ll make it right, &amp; if it&#8217;s not right then, make sure you&#8217;re in a Starbucks.&#8221;  Good as far as slogans go.  But not really revealing anything unique about Starbucks &#8211; I&#8217;m sure the many other coffeehouses would claim the same.</p>
<p>I think this shows me how &#8220;social media&#8221; is now somehow identified with &#8220;grassroots&#8221; and &#8220;reaching out,&#8221; but that the message really hasn&#8217;t changed.  They may do something &#8220;innovative&#8221; like create a facebook app, or start advertising in social media.  But at the heart of it &#8211; the message &#8211; it&#8217;s the same.  It&#8217;s just an extra &#8220;gloss&#8221; and attempt at making an already-existing message somehow seem more &#8220;real.&#8221;</p>
<p>Odd as well: it almost sounds like a group of Christians sitting around talking about the gospel.  At first I thought that this was going to be some kind of Christian spoof on Starbucks, with a type of moral lesson at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

